The purpose of this blog is to describe my current academic and research pursuits, areas of personal interest, and related activities. Such areas include unmanned development, teleoperation, situational awareness, human-machine interfaces (HMI), simulation, and human-in-the-loop research. My intent is to provide a forum to capture the attention of similar researchers, foster collaborative interest, and provide feedback or editorial responses.
Showing posts with label Dr. Brent Terwilliger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dr. Brent Terwilliger. Show all posts
Monday, April 22, 2013
Traveling to the Ohio UAS Conference
This morning I'm preparing to depart Washington, DC for the birthplace of aviation, Dayton, Ohio. On Wednesday I will be sitting on an Academic Panel for the Ohio UAS Conference, hosted by Sinclair Community College. The focus of this panel will be to discuss how higher education can best support this growing field, including integration of UAS into the National Airspace System. I'm very excited to convey what contributions Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide is making in terms of education, curriculum, and research. I'm also looking forward to sharing recommendations regarding how academia can provide support and leadership within the domain.
Saturday, April 20, 2013
Observations from Real World Design Challenge
Today I had the fortunate opportunity of spending time with student participants of the Real World Design Challenge. Focus for this competition was put on time and cost to determine efficiency, with the students required to identify a viable business case. Throughout the day I observed presentations and met with students and their mentors.
What I was most impressed with was the capability of teams to:
-apply real industry project titles/roles to team members and successfully implement the expectations of these roles
- use industry professionals for their input and guidance
- provide detail definitions of ground support equipment
-use the engineering design process, with defined staging and milestones in their efforts
-perform risk analysis and use the findings in selection and justification of designs
-identify transportation/ logistical considerations for proposed designs
-employ methodical approaches, featuring statistical analysis, during component selection for designs (e.g., application of component driven design, quantitative analysis, and qualitative down select)
-propose innovative flight patterns to perform scanning/detection of an environment of mixed terrain (no trees, small, med, large trees)
-perform visual line of sight (VLOS) calculations using Pythagorean geometry
-provide business case examples (e.g., compared costs to manned and other UAS options, uses, and operational costs)
-use of simulation to test/verify desired aerodynamic considerations for fixed-wing performance
In the future, it would be beneficial for teams to consider:
-logistical support equipment necessary for use of internal combustion propulsion (glow plug, electric start, fuel, maintenance considerations)
-mitigation of adverse effects (e.g., vibration, exhaust, reduce throttle response, additional support requirements)
-use of identical components/designs to support maintenance and commonality of design
-reference construction materials
What I was most impressed with was the capability of teams to:
-apply real industry project titles/roles to team members and successfully implement the expectations of these roles
- use industry professionals for their input and guidance
- provide detail definitions of ground support equipment
-use the engineering design process, with defined staging and milestones in their efforts
-perform risk analysis and use the findings in selection and justification of designs
-identify transportation/ logistical considerations for proposed designs
-employ methodical approaches, featuring statistical analysis, during component selection for designs (e.g., application of component driven design, quantitative analysis, and qualitative down select)
-propose innovative flight patterns to perform scanning/detection of an environment of mixed terrain (no trees, small, med, large trees)
-perform visual line of sight (VLOS) calculations using Pythagorean geometry
-provide business case examples (e.g., compared costs to manned and other UAS options, uses, and operational costs)
-use of simulation to test/verify desired aerodynamic considerations for fixed-wing performance
In the future, it would be beneficial for teams to consider:
-logistical support equipment necessary for use of internal combustion propulsion (glow plug, electric start, fuel, maintenance considerations)
-mitigation of adverse effects (e.g., vibration, exhaust, reduce throttle response, additional support requirements)
-use of identical components/designs to support maintenance and commonality of design
-reference construction materials
Seeing What the Next Generation of UAS Developers Have in Store for Us
This morning I'm preparing to visit with some of the most creative minds of the next generation of UAS developers; high school student's whose design entries have earned them a spot at the RealWorld Design Challenge (RWDC) in Washington DC. I'm excited to see what they have in store for us. Considering they have grown up in a world immersed with technology that expouses digital connection, this cadre of learners will be well prepared for the high-paced, collaborative, educational environment at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (ERAU). Expect more to come, as I report on some of the interesting and innovative entries I see today.
Monday, December 3, 2012
I/ITSEC 2012
I will be at the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC) this week, where I will be presenting my paper, Effects of Visual Interaction Methods on Simulated Unmanned Aircraft Operator Situational Awareness, on Wednesday at 8:30AM. For more information see the 2012 I/ITSEC agenda: http://www.iitsec.org/attendees/Pages/Agenda.aspx
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)